Newsletter
Don't miss a thing!
We regularly provide you with the most important news, articles, topics, projects and ideas for One World – No Hunger.
Newsletter
Don't miss a thing!
We regularly provide you with the most important news, articles, topics, projects and ideas for One World – No Hunger.
Please also refer to our data protection declaration.
High agricultural prices affect developed and developing countries alike, but the problem is aggravated for the latter through the lack of or inadequate resilience measures. Our authors explain what can be done to mitigate the negative effects on food security in poor countries.
This interview appeared first in Rural21 and is part of a media cooperation between Rural21 and foodfortransformation.org.
Agricultural prices are pertinent tools in supply chains with an edging impact on food security. Rising agricultural prices – inputs and food alike – push more people into the poverty trap and food insecurity. This is evidenced by the Covid-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine crisis, in which prices skyrocketed and became volatile particularly during the early period of the latter crisis, with a resultant effect on food security in many parts of the globe, especially in developing countries. Yet the implications of changes in agricultural prices on the populace are heterogeneous, affecting consumers, producers, income earners and regions differently, depending on their social capital and on aspects such as social insurance, preparedness and resilience. Thus, this article divulges into the pattern of global agricultural prices, their benefits and the challenges to food security.
Higher global agricultural prices can transmit to domestic prices, where the consumers and producers act as price takers. Their behaviour, the level of domestic markets’ integration into the global economy, trade policies, exchange rates, trade costs and consumer/producers’ price controls, among others, will determine the corresponding domestic prices. In addition, the responsiveness of domestic prices to international prices would be aggregated for net food importers, which many African countries are. This makes them more susceptible to international price shocks due to high import dependency and low domestic food sufficiency. Such price transmission is seen with the Russian-Ukraine and global financial crises, which have pushed more households into poverty and malnutrition, reduced income and escalated food insecurity for countries, especially for net importing ones. Besides, nationally, spatial price transmission is observed from one food market to another in the face of national conflicts and climate-induced drought or rain, which put constraints on food prices and agricultural production. Nonetheless, price transmission varies across commodities and markets – for instance, oilseeds and cereals have been shown to have more globalised markets than meat products.
Rising agricultural prices increase food production costs and reduce productivity, which puts pressure on food prices and food security. However, high agricultural price levels have their pros and cons for producers and consumers. For consumers, rising food prices usually result in a fall in the preferred food and the number of meals consumed, leading to wider food insecurity gaps for both urban and rural populations, particularly for the (urban) poor, who are majorly net food consumers. In addition, high agricultural prices, especially food prices, decrease net income and purchasing power, and they might lead to lower calorie intake or dietary diversity as consumers adjust their consumption patterns to rising prices. All these adjustments can be improvised by consumers, particularly by the poor, thereby increasing their food security status. However, relative to high-income countries, consumers in low-income countries are hurt disproportionately as households in the former spend about 44 per cent of their income on food, while the latter spend 16 per cent on food. Nonetheless, some high agricultural prices might be beneficial for the poor since they increase the demand for unskilled labour, which characterises the skill-set of the majority of the poor, consequently leading to a rise in wages.
Furthermore, for producers, agricultural price hikes can be a catalyst or barrier depending on whether the increase is in the form of agricultural input prices (such as fertilisers or labour) or output prices (such as food). Input prices increase production costs and might dampen profit and producers’ welfare. However, output price hikes such as for food can raise their profit margin, but spikes in commodity prices can harm them as well, because smallholder producers are also consumers of their products. This can have an effect on poverty and food security aggravated for smallholder farmers. In fact, the effect of such an output price increment can be dampened or negative if it is accompanied by an increase in agricultural input prices. This is expected as some input prices have recently outstripped output prices. According to the World Bank, smallholder farmers constitute two billion of the world's population or about 500 million smallholder households world-wide. Most are highly dependent on agricultural commodities as income sources – which increases their susceptibility to commodity price hikes and volatility.
Rising agricultural prices are a major problem for global food security because they have the greatest impact on smallholder farmers who both produce and consume their products.
In terms of distribution, evidence suggests that severe food insecurity is on the rise globally and also in all continents, with Africa being the most affected. Furthermore, following the pandemic and the resultant supply distribution and rising food prices, the severity of food insecurity has risen since 2020, with low-income food-deficit countries being more affected.
Among smallholders, subsistence production is a viable option for increasing livelihood and can buffer the negative effect of high food prices, thus reducing the vulnerability of households to food insecurity. However, its role might be limited in ensuring dietary diversity given that it leaves little room to earn enough. As increased monetary income is important in reducing food insecurity, cash cropping might thus be more advantageous in improving food security relative to subsistence food production. Cash cropping has higher market value and monetary returns which can help smallholders finance their food expenditures (food accessibility), increase their household dietary diversity (food utilisation) and enable them to fight their way out of food insecurity.
However, increased income does not necessarily translate to food security, as there are other uses of household income besides food purchases. In addition, an increase in cash cropping can crowd out food crop production as land for the latter declines, affecting food availability, especially in African countries with limited technology to improve yields. Such a reduction in food production pushes up food prices, and the income earned from cash crops may or may not be enough to offset such price increments, and may thus undermine food security.
Besides, the exact effect of income from such cash cropping on food security will depend on whether government policies support cash or food crops, farm and household size, gender, trade policies, etcetera. For instance, evidence suggests that access to resources by females increases household allocation to food purchases, which can thus ensure more household food security. In addition, access to (global) markets can be deterred by trade policies, particularly food safety measures, which can be very stringent and costly, and might exclude smallholders from the global supply chain.
The global shocks such as Covid-19, climate change, plagues and the Russia-Ukraine war have led to an increased need for relief efforts. However, higher food prices are making support and palliative programmes, food aid, and subsidies and social protection expensive as the price increment strains the budget of governments, donor institutions and development partners in relieving the burden of the vulnerable. This drives the level of poverty and food insecurity upward.
Commodity price changes are sometimes influenced by the nefarious activities of some operators in the commodity value chains involving supply chain disruptions, hoarding, formation of cartels and/or oligopolistic scenarios and monopolies. Such activities often influence the availability and stability of food, creating artificial scarcity and higher prices. To mitigate these challenges, there is a need for an adequate and extensive regulatory framework that governs the activities of food supply chain operators and curbs exploitative behaviour in the food systems. Moreover, there is the risk of higher future food prices and food insecurity if the Black Sea Grain Arrangement collapses and access to fertilisers is restricted. Overcoming the challenges entails a reduction in trade restrictions and removal of supply chains and/or market access challenges/ bottlenecks.
High agricultural prices affect developed and developing countries alike, but the problem is aggravated for the latter through the lack of or inadequate resilience measures. Institutionalising price stabilisation support mechanisms such as agricultural output and price support are germane interventions that could stabilise incomes, incentivise farmers, particularly smallholders, to invest and increase agricultural production amidst high agricultural prices. In the short run, subsidising consumption, engaging in cash transfers and other food support to the vulnerable might be viable options. Long-run interventions could include the implementation of minimum price models that enable farmers earn a premium over production costs, implementing crop insurance schemes and input subsidies to make farmers more resilient to price shocks. These measures are important to hedge farmers and consumers against income and price fluctuations and food insecurity. In addition, using a common national market platform to trade can help minimise direct price shocks to producers and leverage profits.
Read more “Corona exposes the weaknesses of our nutritional systems"
Read more 5 questions to F. Patterson: Why is there more hunger?
Read more Climate Adaptation Summit 2021: ‘We can do better’
Read more Small-scale farmers’ responses to COVID-19 related restrictions
Read more Video diaries in the days of Corona: Voices from the ground
Read more Resilient small-scale agriculture: A key in global crises
Read more A global signpost: What way is the market, please?
Read more The state of food security in Cape Town and St. Helena Bay
Read more The hype about urban gardening: farmers or hobby gardeners?
Read more How the self-help approach empowers smallholder women
Read more Global responsibility: Tackling hunger is the only way forward
Read more Gender equality: Essential for food and nutrition security
Read more Success story allotment garden: Food supply and women's empowerment
Read more Developing countries hit doubly hard by coronavirus
Read more Statement from GAFSP Co-Chairs: GAFSP and COVID-19 Pandemic
Read more This is how developing countries can adapt better to droughts
Read more What do you expect from this Pre Summit, Mr. Haddad?
Read more Mr. Campari, how do we create sustainable food systems?
Read more Mr. Marí, what happened at the alternative summit?
Read more What is wrong with our nutrition in Germany, Mr. Plagge ?
Read more How Can We Feed The World in Times of Climate Change?
Read more Food System Transformation Starts and Ends with Diversity
Read more Sustainable Artisanal Fisheries and Aquaculture in Rural Areas
Read more Land Rights for Secure Livelihoods: My Land is My Life
Read more City, Country, Sea: 6 Innovations in the Fight Against Climate Change
Read more Engaging the Community to Solve the Bushmeat Crisis
Read more German G7 Presidency – fighting hunger with all our might
Read more ‘Invite yourself’ – Farmers organisations as key stakeholders of food systems
Read more The lessons learned from the last food crisis - A solution?
Read more ‘Preserving and restoring fertile soils is a global responsibility.’
Read more What does it take to truly shift the paradigm on food systems?
Read more Strengthening food markets across the rural-urban continuum
Read more A dashboard as a key tool for global food security
Read more The importance of water for sustainable rural development
Read more How the War against Ukraine Destabilizes Global Grain Markets
Read more The Black Sea Breadbasket in Crisis: Facts and Figures
Read more Fair Trade and Climate Justice: Everything is Conntected
Read more The Rice Sector in West Africa: A Political Challenge
Read more 5 Questions for Jann Lay: What is Corona doing to the economy?
Read more Sustainable, feminist and socially just: The new Africa strategy of the BMZ
Read more The goals of transformation should leave no one behind
Read more BMZ releases video on the transformation of agricultural and food systems
Read more “More of the same is not enough - we need to rethink”
Read more Strengthening the market linkages of smallholders in the face of global supply shocks
Read more Innovative donor approaches and sustainable finance – A Review of UNFSS+2
Read more What is needed for a long-term fertiliser strategy?
Read more What the Middle East conflict means for the children in Gaza
Read more Agricultural Financing – from a broader Perspective
Read more Where can international cooperation in Gaza come in, Ms. Asseburg?
Read more A framework for sustainable and fair agriculture and food systems
Read more From Pledges to Progress: Nutrition at the Heart of Inclusive Development
Read more Is the international community still on track in the fight against hunger?
Read more One Health – What we are learning from the Corona crisis
Read more School Feeding: A unique platform to address gender inequalities
Read more Planetary Health: Recommendations for a Post-Pandemic World
Read more How can the private sector prevent food loss and waste?
Read more Building Better Resilience to Transboundary Threats
Read more Building climate-resilient and equitable food systems: Why we need agroecology
Read more How are transformation and crisis intervention related, Dr. Frick?
Read more How much private investment is the agricultural sector able to bear?
Read more Reference values: A building block on the road to social equality
Read more From start to finish: a vision of interconnectivity
Read more Ms Rudloff, what are the benefits of a supply chain law?
Read more Freed from trade? Towards a fairer EU Trade Agenda
Read more Our Food Systems are in Urgent Need of Crisis-Proofing: what needs to be done
Read more 2022, a year of crisis – What does it mean for African trade and food security?
Read more COVID-19 and Rising Food Prices: What’s Really Happening?
Read more Côte d’Ivoire: Sweet Temptation without a Bitter Taste
Read more Controversy: Do supply chains need liability rules?
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential, while others help to improve your user experience. Your consent is voluntary and can be revoked at any time on the "Privacy" page.
Protects against cross-site request forgery attacks
Saves the current PHP session.
Content from third-party providers, such as YouTube, which collect data about usage. Third-party content embedded on this website will only be displayed to you if you expressly agree to this here.
We use Matomo analytics software, which collects anonymous data about website usage and functionality to improve our website and user experience.